There are atheistic situationists—those who totally reject the Scriptures as having any bearing on morality. Again, according to the situationist, there are no absolutes—except that one absolutely must love in all situations!
Some, for instance, cite the case of the Canaanite harlot, Rahab. But it does not have the sanction of the Holy Scriptures, and, if persistently pursued, will ultimately result in societal chaos.
There are two fundamental categories of situation ethicists. For example, breaking a law to prevent a terrorist attack would invoke a higher, more important cause. There is not a word in the Scriptures that endorses the false story she told in concealing the spies, and it is utter desperation that grasps at this narrative in an attempt to justify situation ethics.
For example, it is generally considered wrong to steal a gun, but if by stealing that gun you prevented the murder of numerous people then your action would be justified, as you had acted in order to serve love. There are no rules—absolutely none—for human conduct; according to this ideology, every person is a law unto himself.
However someone following the guidelines of Situation Ethics may be able to grant the patient their wish, if it was the most loving thing to do in that situation. In contrast, situation ethics refers to a definition of right and wrong rooted in the uniqueness and variability of social situations rather than according to absolute principle.
Fletcher argued that in order to do the most loving thing in every situation we must look at the long term consequences of the options available to us.
In addition to this, Situation ethics can in theory allow acts such as murder, lying, cheating and stealing, for if they were done in the name of love and produced the most love for the community, then by Situation ethics they would be announced morally just.
An absolute legal point of view would be that breaking the law is always wrong, and violators should be punished.
She lied in order to save the Israelite spies; and yet, she is commended in the New Testament record Hebrews Additionally, a key strength this theory possesses is flexibility, and many argue that it allows for pragmatic decisions to be made without having to follow rule-based ethical systems built on absolute commandments, which means that exceptions can be made.
For instance, the theory contends that lying, adultery, murder, etc. Jesus cited the case of David 1 Samuel Some critics argue that situation ethics philosophy is a version of the idea that the end justifies the means.
A married man, with whom she works, decides to have an affair with her in order to comfort her. What a perverted viewpoint! We simply cannot accurately predict the consequences of an action, as there are always a large number of factors, some of which we may even be unaware of, and the required calculations are by and large far too complicated to be done at all, let alone on the spur of the moment in a pressing situation.
This example Situation Ethics Essay is published for educational and informational purposes only. During the first century, thousands of Christians were martyred for their faith.
Therefore if a terminally ill patient in a hospital desired to be allowed to die to end his suffering, a Roman Catholic would deem this immoral. Consider the following scenario. Rules By Which Men Live.
Unfortunately, this is incredibly difficult; some claim it is impossible. Fletcher made four presuppositions before setting out his theory: Value is only added to something when it is useful to love working for the sake of persons. On the other hand, my disciples have violated only your human traditions, and yet you charge them with sin.
Then, in addition, there are religious situationists—including those who allege that the Bible actually endorses this code of action. In addition to these, Fletcher proposed six fundamental principles: The fact is, the disciples had violated only the uninspired traditions of the Jewish elders; they had not transgressed the law of Moses see Edersheim Central to this process is the idea that situational elements alter cases, which in turn alter the principles guiding behavior.
Your theft is non-accountable, as in fact the only accountability in Situation Ethics is whether your actions will result in the highest possible expression on love for others.
As limited human beings, we are not gifted with perfect foresight.Situation ethics is an alternative ethical theory, particularly influential in Protestant Christianity, similar to utilitarianism, in that it is a way a deciding upon the correct action that is to be taken in a given situation, but where happiness has.
‘Situation Ethics is not a practical method of moral decision making?’ How far do you agree? The strongest argument for situation ethics not being a practical method of moral decision making is that it relies on predicting the consequences of an action.
Situation ethics is based on four working principles pragmatism, relativism, positivism and personalism. The first principle is pragmatism which is the practical action to bring about the most loving end. Do you subscribe to the notion of "situational ethics?" Explain why or why not. Joseph Fletcher, identified as the "Father of Situation Ethics", defines situational ethics as a system of ethics by which acts are judged within their contexts instead of by categorical principles (Situation Ethics, p /5(3).
Free situation ethics papers, essays, and research papers. This situation ethics essay is an example of how an essay on such a topic can be organized. It includes intro, thesis, body, and conclusion.Download